When making a choice about how to live, consider this simple question: “What would happen if everyone did it the way I am doing it”?
What would happen if everyone simply lived for themselves, filled with fear and taking whatever they could from others?
Think of a world filled with thieves.
If everyone is stealing from everyone else, eventually there will be nothing left to steal. Somebody has to make stuff for there to be stuff available to steal.
If nobody has the faith to plant the seeds, raise the cattle, build the industry, deliver the goods, and sell the goods, there will be no goods.
It appears easiest to simply take what we need from others, particularly when we are full of fear.
But that is a short term solution to a lifelong problem.
An Alternative Way
What if everybody tried to do their best every single day?
What if everybody gave as much as they could every day?
What would the world look like if we all did exactly the things we know we need to do, and did those things to the very best of our abilities?
How different would the world be?
The world improves or spirals into chaos depending on which path most people chose.
Am I going to be fear filled, worrying about where my next meal is going to come from?
Or am I going to have some faith in this magical place I happily find myself, and give freely knowing that will make the world a better place, and that is the only rational long-term choice?
Can we agree that everyone stealing is not going to work as a solution?
Can we agree that taking from others is not going to work?
Some would have you believe that “they are here to help”. They wax poetic of the injustices of things, and demand others pay up for the unfairness of it all.
It brings up an interesting question: How much are they giving to their favorite charities?
You see, I too have a great interest in feeding the hungry, sheltering the poor, and helping those in need. But here is the difference: For 2016, my wife and I gave 23.1% of our adjusted gross income away. 23.1%.
For our taxable income, we gave 66.5% of our income away. 66.5%.
On an actual income basis, meaning no games, we gave away 34.4% of our gross income. 34.4%. That is NOT including taxes. Just the money we gave to charity.
We put our money where our heart is. Our money. Not your money. We do not DEMAND that you put your money where our heart is. That is our job, not your job.
Which begs a question: How much do my socialist friends give to charity?
You see, when you give to charity or directly to others, it is an act of kindness. It is an act of benevolence.
But, when you do not give to charity, but demand that others give to you or to the charity YOU choose, that is not benevolence.
Can you see the difference?
I find it interesting how often I hear the very folks who are DEMANDING that others “give” to them, talking about how those others are “greedy.”
Indeed. Who is greedy?
You see, socialism seems a lot like altruism. “We are just trying to help…”
Here is a social model to consider: What if the plan was that you should work hard to improve your situation, and then, you would have the option to give to others?
Right now, my friends on the left are squealing that those “greedy” jerks won’t give their money away.
But the real reason that they presume that others will not give their money away, is because my socialist friends do not give their own money away. So, they presume that no one else will either.
Revealing, don’t you think?
To the socialist, it is an act of high honor to demand money from others.
This is the very nature of a racket.
This is false benevolence.
Indeed, it is tyranny.
A real gift is given, not demanded. If you want to help the world, go and do it. If you want to create tyranny, demand others do it.
Pretty simple really.
So, you see, I really do want to help others. I do that by giving a high percentage of my income to various charities, and directly to people in need. Charities and people of MY choice.
This allows me to hold those charities and people accountable.
We look for charities that do demonstrably great work, and are very good stewards of their assets.
Or, we look to give to people who are really trying to better themselves. Helping them get to a point of stability in their lives where they can become self sustaining. Eventually, they can become givers as well, giving back in the way they think is best.
Could there be a more perfect form of democracy? You decide what you will give to, and I will decide what I will give to.
With socialism, there is NO accountability, which is how we end up with disasters like Venezuela, or the Veterans Administration. No accountability.
With socialism, some bureaucrat decides how much money is demanded, and where that money goes. So why would we think that a bureaucrat would not simply line their own pockets, or those of their friends?
Why is it, my socialist friends, that you think that some government bureaucrat is just going to be a good person, with no evidence to show that they are, and no accountability to ensure that they are, no reason for them to be, and no example of that in history?
My giving actually DOES feed people. Real people, who come to the food pantry and get food for their family in need.
I know I am doing a real good that is helping people in real need.
I feel happy to do it.
I want to do it more, and the folks that get that food are truly grateful for the gift. They may even think that one day, they will give to the pantry, and help others the same way they were helped. And thus, this design expands naturally and in a positive, elective and free way.
With socialism, invariably the “giver” is forced, and the “receiver” becomes dependent, and demanding, which turns the “gift” into an “entitlement” for the receiver and a burden for the giver. This puts the entire giving process on its head. It is turned upside down, where the receiver DEMANDS the gift, and the giver becomes a slave.
What could possibly go wrong?
Perhaps the “giver” will figure out that they are being made the fool, and simply stop producing. Why should they continue to produce?
The givers (or producers) are demonized, because it helps the bureaucrats maintain control and justifies the constant taking, and the takers are elevated.
So why not just become a taker?
And then the producer group gets smaller.
This leads to a reduction in production.
And that leads to forced labor.
This is exactly what ALWAYS happens with socialism which is why socialism always fails.
One does not claim benevolence by demanding the fruits of other’s labor.
One is benevolent by giving of their own labor.
Socialism is an evil construct wrapped up in a false claim of kindness.
It is not kindness. It is simply a stealthy evil, which is the most powerful kind of evil.
You will know them by the fruits of their efforts.
Socialism is the greatest mass murderer in history.
So, I ask my socialist friends to share their giving, as I have above. How much did YOU give away last year? Because here is the catch: When you really do give, you realize that you do not need some huge bureaucracy to manage that giving. You can give all you can give without some government official controlling it at all.
At the time of the early aftermath of hurricane Katrina, two young men in their early twenties heard that there was a dire need for portable generators in the destruction zone. These two men purchased two generators, loaded them into the back of a pickup truck, and drove down to the area. They sold the generators for $5,000.00 each.
Is that a good thing, or a bad thing?
Most people have a knee jerk reaction to this that is something like:
“That is TERRIBLE! They are just taking advantage of people when they are in their greatest need. Jerks!”
But here is the thing: They found a need. They filled the need. They were very well compensated for their efforts. Nobody forced the buyers to purchase or pay that price. And most importantly, two folks, and likely those around them, now had access to generated power that was not available to them before.
It reminds me of when I was a young boy, and I saw a man talking on a phone in the back seat of what was clearly a VERY expensive car. I told my mom about it, excited that I saw someone talking on a PHONE in the back of a car! How on earth did he get that? Every phone at the time was tied to a line, and you could get a REALLY long cord that might let you get 20 feet from the base, but nobody had a phone in their car. Well, almost nobody. It was about 1972.
Now, how much do you think that man paid to have that phone in his car? I would guess anywhere from $5,000 to $20,000 per year in 1972 dollars. So, was that not fair? Should we have kept him from having a phone because nobody else had one?
But then something amazing happens…The technology improves. Folks compete. The cost comes down. And today, some grade school kids have phones, and most Junior High kids have phones. And those kids’ phones have GPS, mapping, texting, any number of video games, and even stock trading.
That man back in 1972? His phone allowed him to talk to people. It didn’t even have a clock.
Similarly, those young men made a great profit on their generators, but others heard about it, and the competition was on. You can bet that folks were very willing to put in the effort to meet that need, and at a lower price. So, like the phone example, some early buyers paid a pretty high price, and the costs came down, and the demand was met, and the market balanced out.
Free markets are a GOOD thing. It is up to the buyer and seller to determine the value of a product or service. It is not up to us unless we are a party to the transaction, and it is certainly not up to the government. Because all that would have happened if we followed our knee jerk reaction and made it illegal to “take advantage of people,” is that the two folks that were willing to pay the high price would not have had their generators, and the market for generators would have been slowed down or stopped completely, so folks would have gone without the generated electricity for a longer period of time. All because someone who was not a party to the transaction decided that they should be the transaction’s ultimate arbiter.
Think about it for a couple of seconds…How much do you pay in taxes?
Most folks will think about their tax returns or their W-2 forms.
Not even close. If you are purchasing something, do you want to know the price? If you said “no,” you are kidding yourself. Your tax dollars are purchasing the services provided by the government. So here is the problem: We can’t hold the government accountable because we have no idea what we are paying them, or what we are getting from them.
So back to taxes. Here are a couple things to think about: Have you ever purchased any consumer packaged goods from any company that made any profit during your lifetime? Think Coke, Kellogg’s, Tide detergent. Some like to talk about companies paying “their fair share of taxes.” Here is the problem, those companies don’t pay the taxes, we do. So, do you know how much you paid in taxes for every single US company from which you purchased something? Of course not. And that is a problem.
How about taxes on your gas purchases for you car? Do you know how much of the purchase price of a gallon of gas is a direct tax? According to the American Petroleum Institute the taxes, on average throughout the country, are 48.23 cents per gallon for regular, and 54.38 cents per gallon for diesel. For Californians, those numbers are 63.79 cents and 65 cents respectively. Here in Colorado, those numbers are 40.4 and 44.9 cents respectively. Think that might add up? That about $8.00 to $13.00 every time you fill up a 20 gallon tank!
Now, how about the non direct taxes paid by business? Things like property taxes on triple net leases. Those businesses must earn the money to pay those taxes, and they get that money from the customers they serve. That is you.
I hope you get the idea.
Nobody has any idea how much of their hard earned income is being funneled into government coffers. Nobody. And that includes you and me.
There are so many layers to our tax laws, it is impossible to keep up. Which of course puts every single citizen of this country at risk of breaking the law. Talk about tyranny.
But the biggest problem is that we the people are left with no meaningful way to hold our government accountable. We don’t know what we are paying and we don’t know what we are getting. How can we have any idea if we are getting any value at all?
How can we know if our government is doing a good job?
This has to change. We the people need to do better. We need to expect more. We need to demand more.
We have had a lot of yelling about immigration in the country lately.
Close the borders?
In state tuition?
Did the POTUS do the right thing with executive action?
The list goes on and on.
But here is a test to help you truly assess where your real thinking is on immigration: Do you lock YOUR doors at night, or not?
That was easy.
Not that the immigration question is easy. We need to always remember that we are talking about people, families, and, more than likely, our ancestors were likely immigrants. But, if you think about it, you locking your doors at night is a pretty good indication of where you are, really, when it comes to letting folks just come on in and join you.
So, think about it, and maybe, just maybe, we can move away from demonizing the folks that think we need to get control of the borders. Maybe they aren’t Satan incarnate.
It’s frustrating. We seem to have lost the ability to discuss anything without that conversation devolving into an emotional shouting match where we poke each other in the eye and call each other names. Then, we can’t seem to figure out why no one is listening.
When people get frustrated, we tend to lash out irrationally. Like a small child throwing a fit. It’s not terribly productive, or attractive.
I, like you (if you are honest), am GUILTY as charged.
So here is the idea: Can we drop the emotion and really try to listen? Or, at a minimum, can we allow the other party to get emotional, and not pick up that emotion, and escalate the situation? Can we let other people’s inability to communicate maturely be their problem, and not make it our problem?
Until we do that, I am afraid it will be more and more of the same noises around here, with the same devolving, and the same damage.
I toyed with the martial arts as a teenager. I thought it would be cool to be able to do the things I saw in the movies: Billy Jack, Bruce Lee, Chuck Norris. Really cool. I am by no means an imposing male. At high school graduation, I was all the way up to 5′ 11″ and 135 pounds soaking wet. Some misguided folks might call me “skinny”, but the PC term is “built for speed”, or at least “slender.” So I learned a little trick from the martial arts: when someone comes after you, step aside. You never take on an attacker directly. You use their momentum to your advantage.
So it is with these difficult discussions. Here is one common trajectory of a difficult discussion:
Human #1: “Abortion stops a beating heart.”
Human #2: “But you can’t be saying that you are against a woman’s right to choose.”
Human #1: “That choice kills a baby.”
Human #2: “So you’re saying that you get to decide what a woman does with her own body? Anyone that thinks like that is a troglodyte.”
Troglodyte #1: “Well you’re an evil idiot that kills babies.”
Evil Idiot #2: “Shut up Troglodyte $#@#!%!!”
Troglodyte $#@#!% #1: “YOU shut up Evil Idiot!”
Evil Idiot #2: “NO! YOU SHUT UP TROGLODYTE $#@#!% !”
TROGLODYTE $#@#!% #1: “EVIL IDIOT!!!”
EVIL IDIOT #2: (storms away screaming): “TROGLODYTE SOMETHINGs are allthesame!!!”
Yep, just like that. I have a suspicion that nobody had their mind, or perhaps more importantly their heart, changed. Both folks have a heart rate of 195+. Both are ANGRY. And, both parties have additional support for their preferred confirmation biases. And the cycle continues.
How nice. That should help a lot. They then return to their respective support “corners” and grumble about “those people,” and enjoy the comradery of calling out the (TROGLODYTE $#@#!%) or (EVIL IDIOT) to those who agree with their views, deepening the chasm that divides us.
We do this all the time, and it is insanity.
People often forecast their expectations on me. Some assume that I am a hard core liberal. Others assume I am a hard core conservative.
The truth is, of course, somewhere else. I am neither. I have deep issues with both parties in the US. Mainly because both parties have platforms with conflicting principles.
MY (almost) GUARANTEE: You will not agree with me on everything. Guaranteed. And that is OK. We would not have much to explore if we agreed on everything.
My REQUEST of YOU:
– Read what is here.
– Think about it. (No, REALLY: think about it)
– Comment on what you read, but only comment AFTER you have thought about it (BALANCED THOUGHT), AND…After your emotion has subsided,
– Don’t allow yourself to get emotional to the point of hatred and believing in your heart that I am some evil something.
None of us are at our best we when are ready to yell “TROGLODYTE $#@#!%” or “EVIL IDIOT”, so please refrain from commenting if you are in that state. I believe that the vast majority of people are trying to make things better. We just have big disagreements as to how to go about making things better.
So, this is about the exchange of ideas, nourished with Balanced Thought, respect, and the removal of the emotion that leads us to call names.
I think it is worth a try.
I hope you do too.
Where practical discussions lead to understanding, better relationships and real solutions